Proxmark3 community
Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.
Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.
"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia
You are not logged in.
Announcement
Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord
Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.
Pages: 1
Topic closed
#1 2020-04-16 15:57:28
- guew
- Contributor
- Registered: 2020-04-16
- Posts: 2
Question on "Parity weakness".
I implemented crypto1, based on paper"Wirelessly Pickpocketing a Mifare Classic Card", on a 8-bit MCU with RC522(automatic parity generation off) reader. Everything is fine from request to authentication.
For authentication, I have:
Reader: 0x60, 0x00, 0xF5, 0x7B //Auth block0.
Tag: Nt //4 Bytes tag nounce.
Reader: {Nr0, Nrp0, Nr1, Nrp1, Nr2, Nrp2, Nr3, Nrp3, Ar0, Arp0, Ar1, Arp1, Ar2, Arp2, Ar3, Arp3} //Nrn and Arn are reader nounce and response bytes, Nrpn and Arpn are parity bits.
Tag: {At} //Tag response.
Above authentication process works correct.
When try to repeat section3.1"Parity weakness" on page 6 of paper, I manually change Arn, like Arn += 1, and keep Arpn touched, the tag suppose to send back 4-bit error code 0x5. But the tag keep quiet and refuse to give any answer.
Is my process wrong or this "Parity weakness" bug is fixed in nowdays(the paper pulished 12 years ago.) tag?
Offline
#2 2020-04-16 16:40:57
- iceman
- Administrator
- Registered: 2013-04-25
- Posts: 9,538
- Website
Re: Question on "Parity weakness".
Welcome and thank you for reading the introduction post http://www.proxmark.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=1125.
Your access rights has been updated.
Offline
Pages: 1
Topic closed