Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.
Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.
"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia
You are not logged in.
Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord
Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.
Pages: 1
Pyramid ID Found - BitLength: 26, FC: 79, Card: 5321 - Wiegand: 9e2992, Raw: 000101010101010101010149f1a7253d
Checksum 3d failed - should have been 64
Why this happen and how to fix?
Offline
which version of pm3 are you using?
Offline
which version of pm3 are you using?
Your latest.
Offline
Would you make a dump of the data signal and share via sendspace?
lf search
data save nnn.pm3
Offline
3D is the correct checksum. it is a valid 26 bit pyramid tag.
Offline
I made a clone from yr FC/CN. I'm pretty sure you don't have my last version.
pm3 --> lf pyr clone 79 5321
Preparing to clone Farpointe/Pyramid to T55x7 with Facility Code: 79, Card Number: 5321
Blk | Data
----+------------
00 | 00107080
01 | 00010101
02 | 01010101
03 | 01010149
04 | f1a72564
pm3 --> lf se
Reading 30000 bytes from device memory
Data fetched
Samples @ 8 bits/smpl, decimation 1:1
NOTE: some demods output possible binary
if it finds something that looks like a tag
False Positives ARE possible
Checking for known tags:
Pyramid ID Found - BitLength: 26, FC: 79, Card: 5321 - Wiegand: 9e2992, Raw: 000101010101010101010149f1a72564
Checksum 64 passed
Valid Pyramid ID Found!
Offline
@iceman, i think your checksum calculation is flawed. 64 is not the correct checksum
Offline
i confirmed with my fork the checksum is correctly calculated at 3D (original poster's value) NOT 64 (iceman's fork)
Offline
You were right, that was a faulty call inside the crc algo (from my legic crc experiments) Thanks for pointing out and verifing it.
I've pushed the fix to my fork.
recompile your client and it should work just fine
Offline
Pages: 1