Proxmark3 community

MaBi

Contributor

Registered: 2016-11-06

Posts: 24

Card not vulnerable

Hi
I'm trying to hack a card but result it's not what I aspected.
I have flashed SW v2.2.0 on my Proxmark3 rdv2:

[[[ Cached information ]]]
Prox/RFID mark3 RFID instrument          
bootrom: /-suspect 2015-08-16 18:49:55
os: /-suspect 2015-08-16 18:50:03
LF FPGA image built for 2s30vq100 on 2015/03/06 at 07:38:04
HF FPGA image built for 2s30vq100 on 2015/06/22 at 21:47:54
uC: AT91SAM7S512 Rev B          
Embedded Processor: ARM7TDMI          
Nonvolatile Program Memory Size: 512K bytes. Used: 166521 bytes (32%). Free: 357767 bytes (68%).          
Second Nonvolatile Program Memory Size: None          
Internal SRAM Size: 64K bytes          
Architecture Identifier: AT91SAM7Sxx Series          
Nonvolatile Program Memory Type: Embedded Flash Memory          

This is my hw tune output:

Measuring antenna characteristics, please wait...#db# DownloadFPGA(len: 42096)                 
......#db# DownloadFPGA(len: 42096)                 
.          
# LF antenna: 46.06 V @   125.00 kHz          
# LF antenna: 20.49 V @   134.00 kHz          
# LF optimal: 46.75 V @   123.71 kHz          
# HF antenna: 30.13 V @    13.56 MHz          

Card is a MIFARE Classic 1k:

 UID : 8b 3a 5b 1d           
ATQA : 00 04          
 SAK : 08 [2]          
TYPE : NXP MIFARE CLASSIC 1k | Plus 2k SL1          
proprietary non iso14443-4 card found, RATS not supported          
Answers to chinese magic backdoor commands: NO          

The only good result is a key found with "Test Block Keys" command. So I have one key:

--sector: 0, block:  3, key type:A, key count:13           
Found valid key:[a0a1a2a3a4a5]          

Now, if I try a Darkside attack I obtain the output "Card is not vulnerable to Darkside attack (its random number generator is not predictable)." and similar with a Nested attack: "Tag isn't vulnerable to Nested Attack".

What could I do?
Thanks

MaBi

Contributor

Registered: 2016-11-06

Posts: 24

Re: Card not vulnerable

What are steps to use the "hardnested" attack ?
I have read many posts where it seems easy but I can't launch command.
If I try something like this:

hf mf hardnested 0 A a0a1a2a3a4a5 44 B w

I receive only the help with commands listed.

I don't understand. Is it a software version problem ?

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,537

Website

Re: Card not vulnerable

Does the "hardnested" command show in that list of commands?   if not, then you have your answer to your question.

piwi

Contributor

Registered: 2013-06-04

Posts: 704

Re: Card not vulnerable

Your software version 2.2.0 doesn't include the hf mf hardnested command. You have the following options:

• download one of the newer precompiled binaries (see http://www.proxmark.org/forum/viewtopic … 586#p26586)

• download the source code from github (my hardnested branch or iceman's fork) and compile it yourself

MaBi

Contributor

Registered: 2016-11-06

Posts: 24

Re: Card not vulnerable

Thank you very much. Now I know why I couldn't use it.
Unfortunately I have problems with both options...
Precompiled binaries crash and I can't compile source code of your hardnested branch.

ntk

Contributor

Registered: 2015-05-24

Posts: 701

Re: Card not vulnerable

you can either use proxspace or minGW build environment to compile the SW .... there is detailed instruction to setup somewhere on the forum.

MaBi

Contributor

Registered: 2016-11-06

Posts: 24

Re: Card not vulnerable

Now I can compile correctly source code. I have a valid ProxSpace with Qt v4.6.2 and miniGW v5.3.0.
I don't get any compiling errors but every time I try to lunch my new compiled sw it crashes again.
I have tried both version (piwi and iceman 1.7.0, 1.6.8, ...)

I have flashed bootrom and fullimage files correctly on device. With an old client version (pm3-bin-2.2.0) I can verify it

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,537

Website

Re: Card not vulnerable

Regard: sw crash.
There is little to go with when all you say "it crashes again".   You need to supply more information if you expect anyone to help out.
Start a new thread regarding this crash in relevant category,  but search the forum first to see if its already been answered.

MaBi

Contributor

Registered: 2016-11-06

Posts: 24

Re: Card not vulnerable

Crash is due to two missing files in output folder (client): QtCore4.dll and QtGui4.dll.
But there is no difference if I add them in the folder and lunch proxmark3 again.
With JIT Debugger and VS I obtain that error code is  0xC0000005.
In another post I have read that I need probabily to recompile Qt4. Unfortunately I'm using ProxSpace by gator where Qt is "light" version and links in the post are broken...

Is this the correct way?
Thanks

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,537

Website

Re: Card not vulnerable

download a build env / or setut it up yourself,    pull latest sourcecode,  recompile, and you should be good to go.

MaBi

Contributor

Registered: 2016-11-06

Posts: 24

Re: Card not vulnerable

Is there a list of commands where I can find more informations about syntax and parameters ?
I have found Wiki list but I'm looking for hf mf hardnested or hf mf chk *4 (iceman fork) for example.

Thanks

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,537

Website

Re: Card not vulnerable

many commands has a help text nowdays with h parameter.

hf mf gives some help
hf mf hardnest h gives some more help

You find Iceman fork command set here http://www.icedev.se/pm3cmds.aspx