Proxmark3 community
Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.
Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.
"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia
You are not logged in.
Announcement
Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord
Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.
Pages: 1
#1 2019-04-07 16:08:06
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
[solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
My 1 dump with 0.21 on the mifare classic card is equal to my dump with 0.64 on the card.
Mifare classic app shows KeyA and KeyB.
"-" "- -" and more "- - -" in many the sectors.
No errors. No message of missing keys.
Is this possible? Where is the data? Where are the values on the card?
Please advise.
Last edited by pbtek (2021-01-17 18:44:17)
Offline
#2 2019-04-08 20:10:30
- gator96100
- Contributor
- From: Austria
- Registered: 2016-03-25
- Posts: 177
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
"-" means MCT cannot access the data because of a missing key (Key B in this case).
I am familiar with these cards, they are based on the microtronic payment system, B-Keys are generated with a 3des based key diversification.
Nested attack does usually work on those cards although most of the mifare mini cards need hardnested to get the B-Keys.
Offline
#3 2019-04-08 21:02:26
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
thank you gator96100
gezzzz... in my mind the sector 0 the A0A1A2A3A4A5 and B0B1B2B3B4B5 is the key A and key B....like forever... like in all the sectors in the card. oh boy!! 
Nested attack or hardnested ?
i am waiting for my ACR122U to arrive...
any recommended reading?
Offline
#4 2019-04-25 11:00:04
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
mfoc -P 500 -O original.dmp
edit1: ... and it keeps running forever and ever!
edit2: "mfoc: ERROR: No success, maybe you should increase the probes."
NO KEYS!
Last edited by pbtek (2019-04-27 12:13:34)
Offline
#5 2019-04-25 14:27:14
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Please help!!
Offline
#6 2019-04-26 11:52:06
- gencat
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-03-25
- Posts: 3
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
mfoc implements Nested Authentication attack, you should try hardnested?
Offline
#7 2019-04-26 12:28:02
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
now running...
mfcuk -C -R -1 -s 500 -S 500 -O original.dmp -v 3
edit1: auths: 12000. still nothing.
edit2: I aborted the execution at 22000 auths with no results
Last edited by pbtek (2019-04-27 12:07:08)
Offline
#8 2019-04-26 12:57:00
- iceman
- Administrator
- Registered: 2013-04-25
- Posts: 9,537
- Website
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Maybe ask mfoc / mfuc questions in a libnfc / nfc-tools related forum? Or Github? This is a dedicated proxmark3 forum.
We use things like here.
pm3-->hf mf mifare
pm3-->hf mf nested
pm3-->hf mf hardnest
or the separete tools
$> cd tools/nonce2key
$> cd tools/mfkeyOffline
#9 2019-04-26 13:18:27
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Hello Iceman. Sorry... did not find help anywhere. And you guys look professionals 
Those "things" sound cool... but do they recover my missing keys? Yes? Where do i buy one unit proxmark3?
My brand new ACR122U does not support hf mf ***
Offline
#10 2019-04-26 20:58:34
- gator96100
- Contributor
- From: Austria
- Registered: 2016-03-25
- Posts: 177
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
It is simple...
mfcuk=DarkSide
mfoc=nested
miLazyCracker=hardnested
Those cards have the fixed PRNG, so they are no longer vulnerable to the card-only attacks performed by MFOC/MFCUK.
miLazyCracker should work with the ACR122U, but you will not receive support for it here.
Offline
#11 2019-04-26 22:16:35
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
hello gator96100. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Proceding to miLazyCracker ...
git clone https://github.com/nfc-tools/miLazyCracker
or
git clone https://github.com/ilumitr/miLazyCracker
cd miLazyCracker
(CraptEV1 / Crapto1 source packages are not available anymore by their author. Find a copy by yourself. I did.)
wget http://aaaaaaaaaaaa/craptev1-v1.1.tar.xz
wget http://bbbbbbbbbbbb/crapto1-v3.3.tar.xz
./miLazyCrackerFreshInstall.sh
mkdir mydumps
cd mydumps
miLazyCracker
edit: probes are increasing but distance is always 64.... hummm.....
Last edited by pbtek (2019-04-27 12:59:23)
Offline
#12 2019-04-26 22:32:43
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
PRNG (Pseudo Random Number Generator) have been fixed in newer Mifare cards...
Details of my card:
Last edited by pbtek (2019-04-26 22:35:07)
Offline
#13 2019-04-27 09:39:43
- piwi
- Contributor
- Registered: 2013-06-04
- Posts: 704
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Yes, and this is why you need hardnested instead of nested attack. But no support for your software and hardware here...
Offline
#14 2019-04-27 09:42:29
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
A Sad Day for Mankind
In the end miLazyCracker retuns: "mfoc: ERROR: No success, maybe you should increase the probes."
edit:
gator96100, gencat, iceman, piwi: will proxmark3 recover my missing keys?
Running out of options!
Last edited by pbtek (2019-04-27 12:18:01)
Offline
#15 2019-04-27 14:55:54
- piwi
- Contributor
- Registered: 2013-06-04
- Posts: 704
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Mankind will survive a few days more...
In the end miLazyCracker retuns: "mfoc: ERROR: No success, maybe you should increase the probes."
This is not the mfoc result for a hardened PRNG. Hardnested therefore did not run yet. Maybe it is something like a Fudan clone? Nevertheless, and we are repeating: this is the Proxmark forum. You should ask your questions in a more apropriate forum.
Offline
#16 2019-05-24 14:54:58
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
No more options.... Are there any volunteers to experiment with my card? Like a challenge...
Offline
#17 2019-05-24 20:48:25
- gator96100
- Contributor
- From: Austria
- Registered: 2016-03-25
- Posts: 177
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Today is your lucky day. I was bored, have an acr122u and have the same card. I hope you are not running Kali in a VM, I tried that and there is a bug with lib-nfc.
My card:
[usb] pm3 --> hf 14a info
UID : 7A 39 6C CB
ATQA : 00 04
SAK : 08 [2]
TYPE : NXP MIFARE CLASSIC 1k | Plus 2k SL1 | 1k Ev1
[=] proprietary non iso14443-4 card found, RATS not supported
[=] Answers to magic commands: NO
[+] Prng detection: HARDThe installation. If using https://github.com/ilumitr/miLazyCracker you will need to change miLazyCrackerFreshInstall.sh to use an older commit of mfoc in order to work.
root@localhost:~# git clone https://github.com/nfc-tools/libnfc.git
root@localhost:~# cd miLazyCracker/
root@localhost:~/miLazyCracker# wget http://www2.vaneay.fr/mifare/crapto1-v3.3.tar.xz
root@localhost:~/miLazyCracker# wget http://www2.vaneay.fr/mifare/craptev1-v1.1.tar.xz
root@localhost:~/miLazyCracker# ./miLazyCrackerFreshInstall.sh
+ '[' -f /etc/debian_version ']'
+ pkgs=
+ for pkg in git libnfc-bin autoconf libnfc-dev
+ dpkg -l git
+ for pkg in git libnfc-bin autoconf libnfc-dev
+ dpkg -l libnfc-bin
+ for pkg in git libnfc-bin autoconf libnfc-dev
+ dpkg -l autoconf
+ for pkg in git libnfc-bin autoconf libnfc-dev
+ dpkg -l libnfc-dev
+ '[' '' '!=' '' ']'
+ '[' -d mfoc ']'
+ git clone https://github.com/nfc-tools/mfoc.git
Cloning into 'mfoc'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 526, done.
remote: Total 526 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 526
Receiving objects: 100% (526/526), 230.11 KiB | 1.08 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (330/330), done.
+ cd mfoc
+ git reset --hard
HEAD is now at ba072f1 update debian dir with up-to-date packaging
+ git clean -dfx
+ autoreconf -vfi
./miLazyCrackerFreshInstall.sh: line 30: autoreconf: command not found
+ ./configure
./miLazyCrackerFreshInstall.sh: line 31: ./configure: No such file or directory
+ make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
+ sudo make install
make: *** No rule to make target 'install'. Stop.
+ '[' -d crypto1_bs ']'
+ git clone https://github.com/aczid/crypto1_bs
Cloning into 'crypto1_bs'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 5, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done.
remote: Total 373 (delta 1), reused 2 (delta 0), pack-reused 368
Receiving objects: 100% (373/373), 136.17 KiB | 1.02 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (238/238), done.
+ cd crypto1_bs
+ git reset --hard
HEAD is now at 873a384 Merge branch 'master' of github.com:aczid/crypto1_bs
+ git clean -dfx
+ patch -p1
patching file libnfc_crypto1_crack.c
+ tar Jxvf ../craptev1-v1.1.tar.xz
craptev1-v1.1/
craptev1-v1.1/readme
craptev1-v1.1/Makefile
craptev1-v1.1/craptev1.h
craptev1-v1.1/craptev1.c
craptev1-v1.1/solve.c
craptev1-v1.1/0xcafec0de.txt
+ mkdir crapto1-v3.3
+ tar Jxvf ../crapto1-v3.3.tar.xz -C crapto1-v3.3
crapto1.c
crapto1.h
crypto1.c
readme
+ make
gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -march=native solve_bs.c crypto1_bs.c crypto1_bs_crack.c crapto1-v3.3/crapto1.c crapto1-v3.3/crypto1.c -I crapto1-v3.3/ craptev1-v1.1/craptev1.c -I craptev1-v1.1/ -o solve_bs -lpthread -lm
gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -march=native solve_piwi_bs.c crypto1_bs.c crypto1_bs_crack.c crapto1-v3.3/crapto1.c crapto1-v3.3/crypto1.c -I crapto1-v3.3/ craptev1-v1.1/craptev1.c -I craptev1-v1.1/ -o solve_piwi_bs -lpthread -lm
gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -march=native solve_piwi.c crypto1_bs.c crypto1_bs_crack.c crapto1-v3.3/crapto1.c crapto1-v3.3/crypto1.c -I crapto1-v3.3/ craptev1-v1.1/craptev1.c -I craptev1-v1.1/ -o solve_piwi -lpthread
gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -march=native libnfc_crypto1_crack.c crypto1_bs.c crypto1_bs_crack.c crapto1-v3.3/crapto1.c crapto1-v3.3/crypto1.c -I crapto1-v3.3/ craptev1-v1.1/craptev1.c -I craptev1-v1.1/ -o libnfc_crypto1_crack -lpthread -lnfc -lm
+ sudo cp -a libnfc_crypto1_crack /usr/local/bin
+ sudo cp -a miLazyCracker.sh /usr/local/bin/miLazyCracker
+ echo Done.
Done.And running of miLazyCracker:
root@localhost:~/miLazyCracker# mkdir mydumps
root@localhost:~/miLazyCracker# cd mydumps/
root@localhost:~/miLazyCracker/mydumps# miLazyCracker
Found Mifare Classic 1k tag
ISO/IEC 14443A (106 kbps) target:
ATQA (SENS_RES): 00 04
* UID size: single
* bit frame anticollision supported
UID (NFCID1): 7a 39 6c cb
SAK (SEL_RES): 08
* Not compliant with ISO/IEC 14443-4
* Not compliant with ISO/IEC 18092
Fingerprinting based on MIFARE type Identification Procedure:
* MIFARE Classic 1K
* MIFARE Plus (4 Byte UID or 4 Byte RID) 2K, Security level 1
* SmartMX with MIFARE 1K emulation
Other possible matches based on ATQA & SAK values:
Try to authenticate to all sectors with default keys...
Symbols: '.' no key found, '/' A key found, '\' B key found, 'x' both keys found
[Key: ffffffffffff] -> [................]
[Key: a0a1a2a3a4a5] -> [////////////////]
[Key: d3f7d3f7d3f7] -> [////////////////]
[Key: 000000000000] -> [////////////////]
[Key: b0b1b2b3b4b5] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 4d3a99c351dd] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 1a982c7e459a] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: aabbccddeeff] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 714c5c886e97] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 587ee5f9350f] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: a0478cc39091] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 533cb6c723f6] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 8fd0a4f256e9] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
Sector 00 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 01 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 02 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 03 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 04 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 05 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 06 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 07 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 08 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 09 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 10 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 11 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 12 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Sector 13 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Sector 14 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Sector 15 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Using sector 00 as an exploit sector
Card is not vulnerable to nested attack
MFOC not possible, detected hardened Mifare Classic
Trying HardNested Attack...
libnfc_crypto1_crack a0a1a2a3a4a5 60 A 60 B mfc_7a396ccb_foundKeys.txt
Found tag with uid 7a396ccb, collecting nonces for key B of block 60 (sector 15) using known key A a0a1a2a3a4a5 for block 60 (sector 15)
Collected 1300 nonces... leftover complexity 1332879000576 (~2^40.28) - press enter to start brute-force phase
.
.
.
Collected 5285 nonces... leftover complexity 1332879000576 (~2^40.28) - initializing brute-force phase...
Starting 12 threads to test 1332879000576 states using 256-way bitslicing
Cracking... 57.06%
Found key: 74a386ad0a6d
Tested 760986562058 states
74a386ad0a6d
mfoc -f mfc_7a396ccb_foundKeys.txt -O mfc_7a396ccb_dump.mfd -D mfc_7a396ccb_unknownMfocSectorInfo.txt
The custom key 0x74a386ad0a6d has been added to the default keys
Found Mifare Classic 1k tag
ISO/IEC 14443A (106 kbps) target:
ATQA (SENS_RES): 00 04
* UID size: single
* bit frame anticollision supported
UID (NFCID1): 7a 39 6c cb
SAK (SEL_RES): 08
* Not compliant with ISO/IEC 14443-4
* Not compliant with ISO/IEC 18092
Fingerprinting based on MIFARE type Identification Procedure:
* MIFARE Classic 1K
* MIFARE Plus (4 Byte UID or 4 Byte RID) 2K, Security level 1
* SmartMX with MIFARE 1K emulation
Other possible matches based on ATQA & SAK values:
Try to authenticate to all sectors with default keys...
Symbols: '.' no key found, '/' A key found, '\' B key found, 'x' both keys found
[Key: 74a386ad0a6d] -> [...............\]
[Key: ffffffffffff] -> [...............\]
[Key: a0a1a2a3a4a5] -> [///////////////x]
[Key: d3f7d3f7d3f7] -> [///////////////x]
[Key: 000000000000] -> [///////////////x]
[Key: b0b1b2b3b4b5] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx///x]
[Key: 4d3a99c351dd] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx///x]
[Key: 1a982c7e459a] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx///x]
[Key: aabbccddeeff] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx///x]
[Key: 714c5c886e97] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx///x]
[Key: 587ee5f9350f] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx///x]
[Key: a0478cc39091] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx///x]
[Key: 533cb6c723f6] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx///x]
[Key: 8fd0a4f256e9] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx///x]
Sector 00 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 01 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 02 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 03 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 04 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 05 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 06 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 07 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 08 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 09 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 10 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 11 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 12 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Sector 13 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Sector 14 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Sector 15 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: 74a386ad0a6d
Using sector 00 as an exploit sector
Card is not vulnerable to nested attack
MFOC not possible, detected hardened Mifare Classic
Trying HardNested Attack...
libnfc_crypto1_crack 74a386ad0a6d 60 B 56 B mfc_7a396ccb_foundKeys.txt
Found tag with uid 7a396ccb, collecting nonces for key B of block 56 (sector 14) using known key B 74a386ad0a6d for block 60 (sector 15)
Collected 125 nonces... ^C
root@localhost:~/miLazyCracker/mydumps#Here an older card where nested does work:
root@localhost:~/miLazyCracker/mydumps# miLazyCracker
Found Mifare Classic 1k tag
ISO/IEC 14443A (106 kbps) target:
ATQA (SENS_RES): 00 04
* UID size: single
* bit frame anticollision supported
UID (NFCID1): 42 55 04 1e
SAK (SEL_RES): 08
* Not compliant with ISO/IEC 14443-4
* Not compliant with ISO/IEC 18092
Fingerprinting based on MIFARE type Identification Procedure:
* MIFARE Classic 1K
* MIFARE Plus (4 Byte UID or 4 Byte RID) 2K, Security level 1
* SmartMX with MIFARE 1K emulation
Other possible matches based on ATQA & SAK values:
Try to authenticate to all sectors with default keys...
Symbols: '.' no key found, '/' A key found, '\' B key found, 'x' both keys found
[Key: ffffffffffff] -> [................]
[Key: a0a1a2a3a4a5] -> [////////////////]
[Key: d3f7d3f7d3f7] -> [////////////////]
[Key: 000000000000] -> [////////////////]
[Key: b0b1b2b3b4b5] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 4d3a99c351dd] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 1a982c7e459a] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: aabbccddeeff] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 714c5c886e97] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 587ee5f9350f] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: a0478cc39091] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 533cb6c723f6] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
[Key: 8fd0a4f256e9] -> [xxxxxxxxxxxx////]
Sector 00 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 01 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 02 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 03 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 04 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 05 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 06 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 07 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 08 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 09 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 10 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 11 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Found Key B: b0b1b2b3b4b5
Sector 12 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Sector 13 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Sector 14 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Sector 15 - Found Key A: a0a1a2a3a4a5 Unknown Key B
Using sector 00 as an exploit sector
Sector: 12, type B, probe 0, distance 14998 .....
Found Key: B [3f7a5c2dbd81]
Sector: 13, type B, probe 0, distance 14998 .....
Found Key: B [21edf95e7433]
Sector: 14, type B, probe 0, distance 14998 .....
Found Key: B [c121ff19f681]
Sector: 15, type B, probe 0, distance 15046 .....
Sector: 15, type B, probe 1, distance 15046 .....
Found Key: B [3d5d9996359a]
Auth with all sectors succeeded, dumping keys to a file!
.
.
.
.
Dump left in: mfc_4255041e_dump.mfd
Do you want clone the card? Place card on reader now and press Y [y/n] nMy guess is that you did not setup miLazyCracker correct and it does not start hardnested.
The time the brute-force phase takes make me really appreciate the precalculated tables for the proxmark.
Offline
#18 2019-08-06 10:09:55
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
proxmark RULEZZ
cd proxmark3/client/
./proxmark3 /dev/ttyACM0
hw ver
Prox/RFID mark3 RFID instrument
bootrom: master/v3.1.0-123-g5a446cb-suspect 2019-08-05 22:15:18
os: master/v3.1.0-123-g5a446cb-suspect 2019-08-05 22:15:20
fpga_lf.bit built for 2s30vq100 on 2015/03/06 at 07:38:04
fpga_hf.bit built for 2s30vq100 on 2019/03/20 at 08:08:07
SmartCard Slot: not available
uC: AT91SAM7S512 Rev A
Embedded Processor: ARM7TDMI
Nonvolatile Program Memory Size: 512K bytes. Used: 207233 bytes (40%). Free: 317055 bytes (60%).
Second Nonvolatile Program Memory Size: None
Internal SRAM Size: 64K bytes
Architecture Identifier: AT91SAM7Sxx Series
Nonvolatile Program Memory Type: Embedded Flash Memory
hw tune
Measuring antenna characteristics, please wait.........
# LF antenna: 25.99 V @ 125.00 kHz
# LF antenna: 31.35 V @ 134.00 kHz
# LF optimal: 33.00 V @ 130.43 kHz
# HF antenna: 36.26 V @ 13.56 MHz
Displaying LF tuning graph. Divisor 89 is 134khz, 95 is 125khz.
hf search
UID : XX XX XX XX
ATQA : 00 04
SAK : 08 [2]
TYPE : NXP MIFARE CLASSIC 1k | Plus 2k SL1
proprietary non iso14443-4 card found, RATS not supported
No chinese magic backdoor command detected
Prng detection: WEAK
Valid ISO14443A Tag Found - Quiting Search
hf mf chk *1 ? d default_keys.dic
|000| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
|001| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | ffffffffffff | 0 |
|002| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | ffffffffffff | 0 |
|003| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | ffffffffffff | 0 |
|004| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | ffffffffffff | 0 |
|005| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | ffffffffffff | 0 |
|006| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
|007| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
|008| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
|009| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
|010| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
|011| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
|012| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
|013| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
|014| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
|015| a0a1a2a3a4a5 | 1 | b0b1b2b3b4b5 | 1 |
hf mf mifare
Card is not vulnerable to Darkside attack (doesn't send NACK on authentication requests).
hf mf hardnested 0 A a0a1a2a3a4a5 4 B w s
--target block no: 4, target key type:B, known target key: 0x000000000000 (not set), file action: write, Slow: Yes, Tests: 0
Using AVX SIMD core.
time | #nonces | Activity | expected to brute force
| | | #states | time
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 | 0 | Start using 4 threads and AVX SIMD core | |
0 | 0 | Brute force benchmark: 172 million (2^27.4) keys/s | 140737488355328 | 9d
1 | 0 | Using 235 precalculated bitflip state tables | 140737488355328 | 9d
5 | 0 | Writing acquired nonces to binary file nonces.bin | 140737488355328 | 9d
6 | 1 | Apply bit flip properties | 140737488355328 | 9d
7 | 1 | Apply bit flip properties | 140737488355328 | 9d
8 | 1 | Apply bit flip properties | 140737488355328 | 9d
9 | 1 | Apply bit flip properties | 140737488355328 | 9d
10 | 1 | Apply bit flip properties | 140737488355328 | 9d
1 "nonces" forever and ever... i am stuck!
hf mf nested 1 0 A A0A1A2A3A4A5 4 B
--nested. sectors:16, block no: 0, key type:A, eml:n, dmp=n checktimeout=471 us
Testing known keys. Sector count=16
nested...
-----------------------------------------------
Error: No response from Proxmark.
Proxmark turns on all the lights and does not respond anymore...
i am stuck!
Last edited by pbtek (2019-11-11 21:53:17)
Offline
#19 2019-08-06 21:58:55
- piwi
- Contributor
- Registered: 2013-06-04
- Posts: 704
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Mixed client and Firmware versions?
Offline
#20 2019-08-07 10:01:08
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
i followed the steps in https://github.com/Proxmark/proxmark3/wiki/Kali-Linux
hw ver
bootrom: master/v3.1.0-123-g5a446cb-suspect 2019-08-05 22:15:18
os: master/v3.1.0-123-g5a446cb-suspect 2019-08-05 22:15:20
Offline
#21 2019-08-07 17:05:46
- piwi
- Contributor
- Registered: 2013-06-04
- Posts: 704
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
I can see that you could flash a current firmware release. Did you also manage to compile the client software?
Prng detection: WEAK
Weird.
Offline
#22 2019-08-09 22:51:29
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
sudo apt install git build-essential libreadline5 libreadline-dev gcc-arm-none-eabi libusb-0.1-4 libusb-dev libqt4-dev ncurses-dev perl pkg-config libpcsclite-dev pcscd
git clone https://github.com/Proxmark/proxmark3.git
cd proxmark3
make clean && make all
dmesg | grep -i usb
I found cdc_acm 1-1:1.0 : ttyACM0: USB ACM device
cd client
make
Holding down the button on the Proxmark3 and continue to hold it down i have attached the Proxmark3 to an empty USB port.
./flasher /dev/ttyACM0 -b ../bootrom/obj/bootrom.elf
ERROR. cannot find proxmark3.
killall ModemManager <----- searching the web found this solution
TRY AGAIN: Holding down the button on the Proxmark3 and continue to hold it down i have attached the Proxmark3 to an empty USB port.
./flasher /dev/ttyACM0 -b ../bootrom/obj/bootrom.elf
Loading ELF file '../bootrom/obj/bootrom.elf'...
Loading usable ELF segments:
0: V 0x00100000 P 0x00100000 (0x00000200->0x00000200) [R X] @0x94
1: V 0x00200000 P 0x00100200 (0x00000c84->0x00000c84) [R X] @0x298
Waiting for Proxmark to appear on /dev/ttyACM0 .
Found.
Flashing...
Writing segments for file: ../bootrom/obj/bootrom.elf
0x00100000..0x001001ff [0x200 / 1 blocks]. OK
0x00100200..0x00100e83 [0xc84 / 7 blocks]....... OK
Resetting hardware...
All done.
Have a nice day!
Now i release the button on the Proxmark3.
./flasher /dev/ttyACM0 ../armsrc/obj/fullimage.elf
Loading ELF file '../armsrc/obj/fullimage.elf'...
Loading usable ELF segments:
0: V 0x00102000 P 0x00102000 (0x0002f098->0x0002f098) [R X] @0x94
1: V 0x00200000 P 0x00131098 (0x000018ec->0x000018ec) [RW ] @0x2f12c
Note: Extending previous segment from 0x2f098 to 0x30984 bytes
Waiting for Proxmark to appear on /dev/ttyACM0 .
Found.
Entering bootloader...
(Press and release the button only to abort)
Waiting for Proxmark to appear on /dev/ttyACM0 .......
Found.
Flashing...
Writing segments for file: ../armsrc/obj/fullimage.elf
0x00102000..0x00132983 [0x30984 / 389 blocks]..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... OK
Resetting hardware...
All done.
Have a nice day!
Last edited by pbtek (2019-08-09 23:11:46)
Offline
#23 2019-08-10 16:04:23
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
hf search
UID : 12 34 56 78
ATQA : 00 04
SAK : 08 [2]
TYPE : NXP MIFARE CLASSIC 1k | Plus 2k SL1
proprietary non iso14443-4 card found, RATS not supported
No chinese magic backdoor command detected
Prng detection: WEAK
Valid ISO14443A Tag Found - Quiting Search
VERSUS
hf mfp info
UID : 12 34 56 78
ATQA : 00 04
SAK : 08 [2]
TYPE : NXP MIFARE CLASSIC 1k | Plus 2k SL1
proprietary non iso14443-4 card found, RATS not supported
No chinese magic backdoor command detected
Prng detection: WEAK
----------------------------------------------
Mifare Plus info:
ATQA: Mifare Plus 2k 4bUID
SAK: Mifare Plus 2k 7bUID
Mifare Plus SL mode: SL1
Last edited by pbtek (2019-11-11 23:13:45)
Offline
#24 2019-08-11 14:02:17
- piwi
- Contributor
- Registered: 2013-06-04
- Posts: 704
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Did you try 'hf mf nested' ?
Offline
#25 2019-08-12 19:48:32
- iceman
- Administrator
- Registered: 2013-04-25
- Posts: 9,537
- Website
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
which device do you have?
Offline
#26 2019-09-30 16:12:28
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
this one...
hummm.... i am thinking in snooping and/or sniffing
Last edited by pbtek (2019-10-02 21:12:46)
Offline
#27 2019-10-01 07:31:39
- Ollibolli
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-27
- Posts: 51
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Proxmark3 "Easy" Clone...?!
Offline
#28 2019-10-02 21:12:03
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
decisions decisions...
hf 14a snoop or hf 14a sniff or hf mf sniff
Last edited by pbtek (2019-10-02 21:17:43)
Offline
#29 2019-10-03 21:38:07
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
UPDATE: hf mf hardnested works (collects nonces fast and recovers the key) with a different card (another company, another purpose, same hf search info)
any ideas to solve 1 #nonces looping forever ??
UPDATE: hf mf nested Error: No response from Proxmark. My device turns on all the lights and does not respond anymore.
Last edited by pbtek (2019-11-03 17:06:07)
Offline
#30 2019-10-30 12:44:08
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
making sense of contents of *.eml file after hf mf sniff d f:
57a8992d4b0804000000000000000000
2e000938093809380938093800000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
a0a1a2a3a4a561e789c1000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
a0a1a2a3a4a561e789c1000000000000 ------> a0a1a2a3a4a5 ------> valid key (tested)
using the same steps...
57a8992d4b0804000000000000000000 ------> 57a8992d4b08 ------> not a valid key
2e000938093809380938093800000000 ------> 2e0009380938 ------> not a valid key
Last edited by pbtek (2019-11-04 16:52:25)
Offline
#31 2019-11-06 10:57:27
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
note to me:
hf mf hardnested 0 A a0a1a2a3a4a5 4 B
9 | 1 | Apply bit flip properties | 140737488355328 | 9d
300 | 1 | Apply bit flip properties | 140737488355328 | 9d
400 | 1 | Apply bit flip properties | 140737488355328 | 9d
1# nonces looping forever or unable to Apply bit flip properties ?? hummmm
Last edited by pbtek (2019-11-06 10:57:54)
Offline
#32 2019-11-08 18:03:46
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
after hf mf sim u 12345678 n 0 x
Collected two pairs of AR/NR which can be used to extract keyB from reader for sector 5:
how can i run mfkey32?? where is it?
PS: now using the Official Precompiled x64 build and PM3UniversalGUI.exe
Last edited by pbtek (2019-11-08 23:54:22)
Offline
#33 2019-11-10 10:36:28
- iceman
- Administrator
- Registered: 2013-04-25
- Posts: 9,537
- Website
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
look under the folder /tools in the repo. I don't think the precompiled binary distros builds that folder. You should download latest ProxSpace v322 and clone the repo, then you will have easy access to everything.
Offline
#34 2019-11-10 21:44:51
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
ok. steps in kali:
1- clone, make, flash all the stuff again
2 - cd proxmark3/client/
3 - ./proxmark3 /dev/ttyACM0
Prox/RFID mark3 RFID instrument
bootrom: master/v3.1.0-156-gea5e5d0-suspect 2019-11-10 18:00:51
os: master/v3.1.0-156-gea5e5d0-suspect 2019-11-10 18:00:53
fpga_lf.bit built for 2s30vq100 on 2015/03/06 at 07:38:04
fpga_hf.bit built for 2s30vq100 on 2019/10/15 at 18:34:30
SmartCard Slot: not available
uC: AT91SAM7S512 Rev A
Embedded Processor: ARM7TDMI
Nonvolatile Program Memory Size: 512K bytes. Used: 206682 bytes (39%). Free: 317606 bytes (61%).
Second Nonvolatile Program Memory Size: None
Internal SRAM Size: 64K bytes
Architecture Identifier: AT91SAM7Sxx Series
Nonvolatile Program Memory Type: Embedded Flash Memory
proxmark3>
no matter what i try... i get the same help menu
proxmark3> mfkey ??? 
proxmark3> cd tools ???
proxmark3> ./tools ???
This help. Use '<command> help' for details of a particular command.
bla bla bla
Offline
#35 2019-11-11 05:29:24
- mwalker
- Moderator
- Registered: 2019-05-11
- Posts: 318
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
what happens if you try to find the tools folder outside of the proxmark client, i.e. at the command prompt/terminal ?
Offline
#36 2019-11-11 07:20:14
- iceman
- Administrator
- Registered: 2013-04-25
- Posts: 9,537
- Website
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
yes, like mwalker says, the tools folder isn't reached inside the Proxmark client.
Offline
#37 2019-11-11 12:26:49
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
thank you. Proceeding...
root@kali:~/proxmark3/tools/mfkey# make clean && make all
rm -f crypto1.o crapto1.o parity.o util_posix.o mfkey.o mfkey32 mfkey64 mfkey32.exe mfkey64.exe
gcc -std=c99 -D_ISOC99_SOURCE -I../../include -I../../common -I../../client -Wall -O3 -c -o crypto1.o ../../common/crapto1/crypto1.c
gcc -std=c99 -D_ISOC99_SOURCE -I../../include -I../../common -I../../client -Wall -O3 -c -o crapto1.o ../../common/crapto1/crapto1.c
gcc -std=c99 -D_ISOC99_SOURCE -I../../include -I../../common -I../../client -Wall -O3 -c -o parity.o ../../common/parity.c
gcc -std=c99 -D_ISOC99_SOURCE -I../../include -I../../common -I../../client -Wall -O3 -c -o util_posix.o ../../client/util_posix.c
gcc -std=c99 -D_ISOC99_SOURCE -I../../include -I../../common -I../../client -Wall -O3 -c -o mfkey.o ../../client/mifare/mfkey.c
gcc -std=c99 -D_ISOC99_SOURCE -I../../include -I../../common -I../../client -Wall -O3 -o mfkey32 crypto1.o crapto1.o parity.o util_posix.o mfkey.o mfkey32.c
gcc -std=c99 -D_ISOC99_SOURCE -I../../include -I../../common -I../../client -Wall -O3 -o mfkey64 crypto1.o crapto1.o parity.o util_posix.o mfkey.o mfkey64.c
root@kali:~/proxmark3/tools/mfkey#
now running with data collectect from post #32.... (two pairs of AR/NR which can be used to extract keyB from reader for sector 5)
root@kali:~/proxmark3/tools/mfkey# ./mfkey32 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678
recovered key was a0a1a2a3a4a5 (key already known) 
<---- "two pairs of AR/NR which can be used to extract keyB from reader for sector 5"
Another sad day for Mankind
Last edited by pbtek (2019-11-11 12:45:33)
Offline
#38 2019-11-11 22:42:44
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
deleted
Last edited by pbtek (2020-01-12 14:19:20)
Offline
#39 2019-11-12 00:01:28
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
deleted
Last edited by pbtek (2020-01-12 14:19:01)
Offline
#40 2020-01-09 13:07:10
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
help please
Offline
#41 2020-01-09 13:48:49
- iceman
- Administrator
- Registered: 2013-04-25
- Posts: 9,537
- Website
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Still if you post traces from the proxmark client maybe it would be easier.
However I see one problem in the data you provided.
The infamouse static nonce tag (01 20 01 45)
TAG(228):01 20 01 45 [0000] c[0000] Normally no fix but just a week ago there was a solution to find keys on that specific bastard to card.
Download latest source code from official repo and run
HF MF NESTED
It will find keys eventually.
Offline
#42 2020-01-09 16:08:48
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt install git build-essential libreadline5 libreadline-dev gcc-arm-none-eabi libusb-0.1-4 libusb-dev libqt4-dev ncurses-dev perl pkg-config libpcsclite-dev pcscd
git clone https://github.com/Proxmark/proxmark3.git
cd proxmark3
make clean && make all
cd client
make
killall ModemManager
./flasher /dev/ttyACM0 -b ../bootrom/obj/bootrom.elf
./flasher /dev/ttyACM0 ../armsrc/obj/fullimage.elf
hw ver
Prox/RFID mark3 RFID instrument
bootrom: master/v3.1.0-173-ga749b1e-suspect 2020-01-09 14:36:52
os: master/v3.1.0-173-ga749b1e-suspect 2020-01-09 14:36:53
fpga_lf.bit built for 2s30vq100 on 2019/11/21 at 09:02:37
fpga_hf.bit built for 2s30vq100 on 2019/11/13 at 14:52:19
hf mf hardnested 0 A a0a1a2a3a4a5 4 B
1 nonces looping forever
ERROR
Last edited by pbtek (2020-01-09 16:34:29)
Offline
#43 2020-01-09 16:22:20
- iceman
- Administrator
- Registered: 2013-04-25
- Posts: 9,537
- Website
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
You don't seem to notice what ppl write. Now go back to my previous post and read again.
Offline
#44 2020-01-10 22:50:13
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
You don't seem to notice what ppl write. Now go back to my previous post and read again.
really!! WTF it's so not me...
Offline
#45 2020-01-11 04:30:48
- piwi
- Contributor
- Registered: 2013-06-04
- Posts: 704
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
HF MF NESTED
Offline
#46 2020-01-11 08:46:03
- iceman
- Administrator
- Registered: 2013-04-25
- Posts: 9,537
- Website
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
iceman wrote:You don't seem to notice what ppl write. Now go back to my previous post and read again.
really!! WTF it's so not me...
Really its you.
Offline
#47 2020-01-12 14:26:36
- pbtek
- Contributor
- Registered: 2019-04-05
- Posts: 39
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
... and now i see the light!! it works... i have now the keys for this "bastard to card" 
hf mf nested always responded by turning on all the lights from the proxmark and did not respond anymore. disconnect usb. connect usb. I was totally traumatized by this nested cmd (see post #18 and #29)!!
And so this story began in 2019-04-07 and it ends today!!
Many thanks to iceman, piwi, mwalker, gator96100, gencat and Ollibolli.
Thanks for the support.
Thanks for putting up with me.
"
This is the end
Hold your breath and count to ten
[...]
For this is the end
I've drowned and dreamt this moment
[...]
Let the sky fall
"
Offline
#48 2020-01-12 14:36:19
- iceman
- Administrator
- Registered: 2013-04-25
- Posts: 9,537
- Website
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Good, may I suggest you edit your first post and add the prefix [solved] to your title
Offline
#49 2020-02-05 19:28:27
- zorks56
- Contributor
- Registered: 2020-02-02
- Posts: 14
Re: [solved] "-" "- -" and more "- - -"
Hi,my case is identical of pbtek in this post. Infact i have the dame result.... loop for ever ...i tired nested but Mu pm3 crash.please help me.see my post.
http://www.proxmark.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=7560
Offline
Pages: 1