Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.
Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.
"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia
You are not logged in.
Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord
Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.
Pages: 1
Hi all,
I just got my proxmark, and I'm having a hard time figuring what type of card I have.
I started off from the hw tune test
proxmark3> hw tune
#db# Measuring antenna characteristics, please wait... # without any tag, lf antenna connected
#db# Measuring complete, sending report back to host
# LF antenna: 9.94 V @ 125.00 kHz
# LF antenna: 17.19 V @ 134.00 kHz
# LF optimal: 21.21 V @ 136.36 kHz
# HF antenna: 0.06 V @ 13.56 MHz
# Your HF antenna is unusable.
proxmark3> hw tune
#db# Measuring antenna characteristics, please wait... # with the tag, lf antenna connected
#db# Measuring complete, sending report back to host
# LF antenna: 6.18 V @ 125.00 kHz
# LF antenna: 6.98 V @ 134.00 kHz
# LF optimal: 11.01 V @ 150.00 kHz
# HF antenna: 0.00 V @ 13.56 MHz
# Your HF antenna is unusable.
proxmark3> hw tune
#db# Measuring antenna characteristics, please wait... # without any tag, hf antenna connected
#db# Measuring complete, sending report back to host
# LF antenna: 0.13 V @ 125.00 kHz
# LF antenna: 0.00 V @ 134.00 kHz
# LF optimal: 0.00 V @ 12000.00 kHz
# HF antenna: 11.47 V @ 13.56 MHz
# Your LF antenna is unusable.
proxmark3> hw tune
#db# Measuring antenna characteristics, please wait... # with a tag, hf antenna connected
#db# Measuring complete, sending report back to host
# LF antenna: 0.00 V @ 125.00 kHz
# LF antenna: 0.00 V @ 134.00 kHz
# LF optimal: 0.00 V @ 12000.00 kHz
# HF antenna: 8.15 V @ 13.56 MHz
# Your LF antenna is unusable.
I think the result means that the tag is an lf tag.
so i tried to read the data
proxmark3> lf read
#db# buffer samples: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff fa ...
proxmark3>
proxmark3> data samples 4000
Reading 4000 samples
Done!
proxmark3> data plot
proxmark3>
proxmark3>
proxmark3> data save test.txt
saved to 'test.txt'
proxmark3>
test.txt - http://www.sendspace.com/file/ri1kr8
thanks in advance for any help
Offline
need more samples 8000? looks like EM4100?
Last edited by midnitesnake (2014-01-25 23:14:19)
Offline
Unfortunately your LF 125kHz antenna voltage is not so good.
Offline
proxmark3> lf read
#db# buffer samples: 7e 7e 7d 7d 7c 7c 7c 7b ...
proxmark3>
proxmark3>
proxmark3>
proxmark3> data samples 16000
Reading 16000 samples
Done!
proxmark3>
proxmark3>
proxmark3> data plot
proxmark3> data save test2.txt
saved to 'test2.txt'
proxmark3>
test2.txt - http://www.sendspace.com/file/cwp05z
how can i test if this is em4x?
Offline
Try to read it with specific LF em41xx command.
Offline
The em410xread read command is failing ("Thought we had a valid tag but failed at word ...")
Do you have another idea for identifying this tag?
Regards
Offline
EM41x = 0x4b00800fe8
proof:
proxmark3> data load ../../Downloads/test2.txt
loaded 16000 samples
proxmark3> data plot
proxmark3> lf hid demod
proxmark3> data mandemod
Warning: Manchester decode error for pulse width detection.
(too many of those messages mean either the stream is not Manchester encoded, or clock is wrong)
Unsynchronized, resync...
(too many of those messages mean the stream is not Manchester encoded)
Manchester decoded bitstream
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
and
proxmark3> data load ../../Downloads/test2.txt
loaded 16000 samples
proxmark3> data askdemod 1
proxmark3> data mandemod
Warning: Manchester decode error for pulse width detection.
(too many of those messages mean either the stream is not Manchester encoded, or clock is wrong)
Manchester decoded bitstream
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1
1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1
1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1
1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1
Last edited by midnitesnake (2014-01-26 10:47:42)
Offline
midnitesnake, Thanks for the response.
I can see that there is a pattern that emerges and if I decode the bits I get it 0x1003dd8f3fe9b801 and not 0x0x4b00800fe8, what am I doing wrong?
Could you explain what is the meaning of the tests that you performed, and how did you determine that this interpretation is correct?
Regards
Yoav
Offline
midnitesnake, Thanks for the response.
I can see that there is a pattern that emerges and if I decode the bits I get it 0x1003dd8f3fe9b801 and not 0x0x4b00800fe8, what am I doing wrong?
Could you explain what is the meaning of the tests that you performed, and how did you determine that this interpretation is correct?
Regards
Yoav
He said "EM41x".
Have a look on Google...
Offline
put the pattern in http://andrewmohawk.com/EM41X/ - look at the green one! open the details section to understand the bit layout and parity checks, it should then all make sense.
Offline
put the pattern in http://andrewmohawk.com/EM41X/ - look at the green one! open the details section to understand the bit layout and parity checks, it should then all make sense.
Hi midnitesnake, can you ask the author to add also these bit "scrambling" patterns to the above fantastic page ?
Offline
Thanks all, I've managed to read my card
Offline
Pages: 1